Legal Opinion
Prelich v. Medical Resources, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 19, 2011No. Civil Action No. ELH-10-3394PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN LIPTON HOLLANDER, District Judge.
Amanda Prelich, plaintiff, was employed as a “MR Technologist” at Colonnade Imaging Center, a medical imaging center operated by Medical Resources, Inc. (“MRI”), defendant.1 (Proposed) First Amended Complaint and Demand for Jury *657Trial (“Proposed Amended Complaint” or “Prop. Am. Compl.” ECF 15-2) ¶ 12. During her employment, plaintiff learned that she was pregnant with quadruplets, and requested accommodations as to her schedule and information about benefits. Id. ¶ 29. Citing reduction-in-force measures, defendant subsequently…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Elat v. NgoubeneDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Weathersbee v. Baltimore City Fire DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Murphy-Taylor v. HofmannDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Davis v. Baltimore Hebrew CongregationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Hart v. Broadway Services, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2012
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.