Legal Opinion
Altorfer v. Haag
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided December 24, 1934No. Patent Appeals 3347, 3348PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLAND, Associate Judge.
This is a three-party interference proceeding in which Altorfer, as one of the defeated parties in the United States Patent Office, and Dehle as the other, have appealed from the decision of the Board of Appeals which awarded priority in the seven counts of the interference involved to appellee Haag.
The counts relate to an improvement in a washing machine of the type which has in the central portion of the tub an upstanding tubular column, which comes through the bottom of the tub and in water-tight engagement therewith. Through the tubular column is a vertical drive…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Consolidated Fruit-Jar Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Miller v. HaymanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Severson v. OlsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
- Osgood v. RidderstromCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
- Nystrom v. MancusoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Young v. DworkinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Frey v. WagnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
- Maytag Co. v. Brooklyn Edison Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1935