Legal Opinion
Maytag Co. v. Brooklyn Edison Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 17, 1935No. 6888PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BYERS, District Judge.
This cause involves patent No. 1,866,-779 issued to the plaintiff corporation July 12th, 1932, upon application filed by Howard F. Snyder deceased on June 14th, 1922. The plaintiff is the assignee of the applicant, and for convenience reference will be made to the grant as the Snyder *744patent. It has to do with a washing machine referred to as the Maytag.
The defendant corporation is an inhabitant of this district, and is being sued in this court because it has heretofore sold three competing machines known as the Easy, the A. B. C. and the Thor.
No jurisdictional or other…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Smith v. SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Waxham v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Hanifen v. E. H. Godshalk Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1898
- Trussell Mfg. Co. v. Wilson-Jones Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Maytag Co. v. Hurley MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Texas Co. v. Globe Oil & Refining Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1953