Legal Opinion
Young v. Dworkin
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided January 17, 1974No. Patent Appeal No. 9004PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Judge.
This is an appeal from the Board of Patent Interferences1 which awarded priority to the senior party-appellee on the grounds that the junior party-appellant had suppressed or concealed the invention. 35 U.S.C. § 102(g). We affirm.
FACTS
The invention is an expansible envelope formed from single blanks of folda-*1278ble material. The envelope is open at the top and has a gusset (an inward bellow-type fold forming a triangular insert) on each of the two sides plus one at the bottom, thereby permitting expansion into a box-like configuration.
' It appears that sometime prior to November 4,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kendall v. WinsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Mason v. HepburnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1898
- The International Glass Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents v. Thomas J. AllenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Arthur W. Schnick v. Lawrence E. FennCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Apotex Usa, Inc. v. Merck & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Yoshihiro Fujikawa, Mikio Suzuki, Hiroshi Iwasaki, Mitsuaki Sakashita and Masaki Kitahara v. Sompong Wattanasin, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Frank E. Paulik and Robert G. Schultz v. Nabil Rizkalla and Charles N. WinnickCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- The Dow Chemical Company v. Astro-Valcour, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Flex-Rest, LLC v. Steelcase, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.