Legal Opinion

Frey v. Wagner

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 25, 1937No. Patent Appeal 3737PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences which awarded priority in the subject matter of the interference to the party Wagner. The interference is between the patent of the party Frey, No. 1,847,240, dated March 1, 1932, issued upon an application filed June 6, 1930, and an application of the party Wagner filed October 10, 1932. The single count of the interference was copied from the Frey patent by the party Wagner, who, at the same time, requested an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mason v. HepburnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1898
  2. Appert v. Brownsville Plate Glass Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. Jones v. EvansCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  4. Nystrom v. MancusoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
  5. Altorfer v. HaagCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Eolas Technologies Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Young v. DworkinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  3. Peeler v. MillerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  4. Horwath v. LeeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  5. Robert S. Lutzker v. Catherine PletCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API