Legal Opinion

Bolen v. Parks

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 1957No. Civ. 21815PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

This is an action for declaratory relief. Plaintiff seeks a declaration that she is the owner of a 40 per cent proprietary interest in a garden product known as Black Magic, and in a joint venture with defendants for the manufacture and sale of such product. Defendants, on the other hand, deny that plaintiff has any interest in Black Magic or in any such venture and contend that plaintiff’s investment was in the stock of Three Way Distributors, Inc., through which Black Magic was distributed. The trial court determined that plaintiff never acquired any interest in Black Magic or in any joint…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bohn v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Logan v. ForsterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. CodigaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Martin v. Palmer Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Pauley v. FaucettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Apra v. AureguyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Balding v. Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Greene v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Superior Bedding Co. v. ErenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Gerber v. SpectorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API