Legal Opinion

Harrell v. Ames

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1973PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an action for personal injuries sustained when plaintiff’s car was hit head-on by a drunken driver. The primary issue on this appeal is whether a jury verdict- for $25,000 in punitive damages was proper. Defendant does not deny liability for plaintiff’s injuries and has already paid the jury verdict for .$50,000 in general damages and $20,000 in .special damages. We affirm.

This tragedy occurred on New Tear’s Eve,- December 31, 1969, near Brookings, in Curry County. Defendant and her husband started early in preparations for that occasion. At about 5:00 or 5:30 p.m., according to her…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Focht v. RabadaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Noe v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Svejcara v. WhitmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Dorn v. WilmarthOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Walczak v. HealySuperior Court of Delaware · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Nees v. HocksOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Taylor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Peterson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Harrell v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Johnson v. RogersUtah Supreme Court · 1988

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API