Taylor v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHARDSON, J.
— We consider whether punitive damages (Civ. Code, § 3294) are recoverable in a personal injury action brought against an intoxicated driver. As will appear, we have concluded that the act of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated may constitute an act of “malice” under section 3294 if performed under circumstances which disclose a conscious disregard of the probable dangerous consequences. *893Accordingly, we will issue a writ of mandate directing the trial court to reinstate that portion of the complaint which sought recovery of punitive damages.
Petitioner Taylor is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Silberg v. California Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by193 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- White v. Ultramar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
- College Hospital, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
188 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.