Legal Opinion
Martin v. City of Albany
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 29, 1994No. WCB 90-20361; CA A73640; SC S40765PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
The issue in this workers’ compensation case is whether the Board had authority to hear this claim for medical services arising from a doctor’s recommendation that claimant should receive medical treatment 1 in the future. The pertinent statute, ORS 656.327(l)(a), permits an insurer to request a review of medical treatment by the Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services 2 if the insurer
“believes that an injured worker is receiving medical treatment that is excessive, inappropriate, ineffectual or in violation of rules regarding the performance of medical services
* % * >>
The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Gettman v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Jefferson v. Sam's CafeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Weidner v. Oregon State PenitentiaryOregon Supreme Court · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- People v. LoeunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- State v. Gonzalez-ValenzuelaOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Kahn v. Pony Express Courier Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Quintero v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- Newell v. WestonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.