Legal Opinion

People v. Loeun

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1997No. S046514PublishedCited by 172 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

In this case we revisit the Street Terrorism Enforcement and Prevention Act, also known as the STEP Act, which was recently before us in People v. Gardeley (1996) 14 Cal.4th 605 [59 Cal.Rptr.2d 356, 927 P.2d 713].

As we noted in People v. Gardeley, supra, 14 Cal.4th at page 615, the Legislature enacted the STEP Act in 1988 for the express purpose of eradicating criminal activity by street gangs. (Pen. Code, § 186.21; further undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.) Among the STEP Act’s provisions is one imposing additional penalties for felony offenses…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Scales v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by172 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. People v. PruntyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. People v. SengpadychithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. DelozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

167 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API