Legal Opinion

Gettman v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1980No. WCB 78-4221 & 78-4222, CA 15318, SC 26853PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*611LENT, J.

The issue in this workers’ compensation case is whether a claimant’s potential for retraining justifies denying him an award of compensation for permanent total disability.

The record discloses the following undisputed facts. The claimant is a 59 year old man who worked as a laborer and park attendant for the Portland Parks Bureau for 27 years. On March 16, 1977, claimant suffered a back injury in a fall at work. The claimant could not return to his former job. On April 21, 1978, the Workers’ Compensation Department (Department) ordered State Accident Insurance Fund (SAIF) to pay…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Weller v. Union Carbide Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Rogers v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Sahnow v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Inkley v. Forest Fiber Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Hutcheson v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Rogers v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Matter of Compensation of GrableOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Martin v. City of AlbanyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Compensation of Harris v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Harwell v. Argonaut InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API