Legal Opinion
State v. Schindele
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 30, 1995No. Cr. 950199PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVINE, Justice.
This is an appeal by the State from a district court order suppressing evidence. We dismiss the appeal because the suppressed evidence is not “substantial proof of a fact material in the proceeding” as required by section 29-28-07, NDCC.
On the night of October 6, 1994, Nelson County Deputy Sheriff Brad Harrington went to the Tolna home of Debra Schindele and Michael Schindele after getting a call from Debra. When Harrington arrived, Debra told him Michael had been drinking, that he had hit her in the chest and neck, and that he had threatened to kill her. Harrington observed a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. DilgerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. MurrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. FrankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Umpleby Ex Rel. Umpleby v. State Ex Rel. North Dakota State Game & Fish DepartmentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. PippinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. GwytherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. WiestNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Flattum-Riemers v. Peters-RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. BrandnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. EmilNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.