Legal Opinion

State v. Wiest

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2001No. 20000306PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Mitchell Wiest has appealed a judgment of conviction entered on jury verdicts finding him guilty of continuous sexual abuse of a child and terrorizing. We affirm.

[¶ 2] Wiest was charged with three counts of continuous sexual abuse of a child and two counts of terrorizing. The State filed a pretrial motion “for an order allowing hearsay regarding child’s statement about sexual abuse pursuant to rule 803(24), North Dakota Rules of Evidence.” The motion stated, in part:

In this case, the State intends to call the children, ages five (5), eight (8) and nine (9), to testify.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. ErickstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. AshNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. ZimmermanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. BurkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. RamseyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Coughlin Construction Co. v. Nu-Tec Industries, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. KrullNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Clark v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. HirschkornNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API