State v. Emil
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] The State appeals from a district court order granting Wayne Emil, Jr. and Kim Emil’s motions to suppress. We dismiss the appeal because the State failed to file sufficient prosecutor’s statements under N.D.C.C. § 29-28-07(5).
I
[¶ 2] In April 2003, Wayne Emil, Jr. filed a claim with Workforce Safety and Insurance (WSI), alleging he suffered a work-related injury. WSI accepted the claim and began paying disability benefits. In 2007, WSI began investigating whether Wayne Emil, Jr. had made material false statements to WSI by failing to report income and work activities on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. MurrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. BeaneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. SchindeleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. GayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. AlleryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. BoehmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. HawkinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. FleckensteinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. RahierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- G.K.T. v. T.L.T.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.