Legal Opinion

State v. Emil

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2010No. 20090286, 20090287PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] The State appeals from a district court order granting Wayne Emil, Jr. and Kim Emil’s motions to suppress. We dismiss the appeal because the State failed to file sufficient prosecutor’s statements under N.D.C.C. § 29-28-07(5).

I

[¶ 2] In April 2003, Wayne Emil, Jr. filed a claim with Workforce Safety and Insurance (WSI), alleging he suffered a work-related injury. WSI accepted the claim and began paying disability benefits. In 2007, WSI began investigating whether Wayne Emil, Jr. had made material false statements to WSI by failing to report income and work activities on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. MurrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. BeaneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. SchindeleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. GayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. AlleryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. BoehmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. HawkinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. FleckensteinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. RahierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. G.K.T. v. T.L.T.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API