Legal Opinion
National Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 9, 2002No. CIV.A. 01-2199(EGS)PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are non-profit organizations that promote fair housing policies and practices and three individuals from Toledo, Ohio. Plaintiffs are suing Prudential Insurance Company and Prudential Property & Casualty Company (collectively, “Prudential”) under the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”), 42 U.S.C;. § 3601 et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1981, alleging that Prudential engages in policies and practices that discriminate against minority applicants for homeowners, insurance. Specifically, the plaijitiffs challenge the use of certain “redlining”…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Edwards v. Marin Park, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Edwards v. Marin Park, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Equal Rights Center v. Equity ResidentialDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
- Jenkins v. New York City Department of Homeless ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Major v. Plumbers Local Union No. 5 of the United Ass'n of JourneymenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.