Legal Opinion
Edwards v. Marin Park, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 26, 2004No. 02-16820PublishedCited by 256 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal we consider whether a plaintiff may be sanctioned for declining the opportunity to amend her complaint. We answer in the negative. We also address the pleading standard for discrimination claims under the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq.1
I. BACKGROUND
Since 1992, Priscilla Edwards has lived in a mobile home2 in the Marin Park *1060development in Greenbrae, California. See generally Hacienda Valley Mobile Estates v. City of Morgan Hill, 353 F.3d 651 (9th Cir.2003) (describing relationship of a mobile home park to a tenant-homeowner). Edwards alleges —…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Alphonso Thompson v. The Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles, a Public CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by256 opinions
- Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Mendiondo v. Centinela Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Theodore C. Swartz v. Kpmg Llp, and Presidio Advisory Services Inc. Deutsche Bank Ag Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Applied Underwriters, Inc. v. Larry LichteneggerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Richard McGary v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
251 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.