Legal Opinion

Crowell v. Delafield Farmers Mutual Fire Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 30, 1990No. C2-89-1873PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

The plaintiffs, Earl and Vonette Crowell, brought an action for declaratory relief against Delafield Farmers Mutual Fire Insurance Company (hereinafter “Delafield”) after it refused to pay the Crowells for the loss of a farmhouse destroyed by fire. De-lafield claimed that the Crowells had no insurable interest in the property at the time of the fire.

Both parties brought motions for summary judgment. The trial court ruled that the Crowells had an insurable interest in the property. A trial on the issue of damages was held on July 28, 1989, and an order for judgment against…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Blaisdell v. Home Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad v. St. Paul Mercury-Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. Nathan v. St. Paul Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  5. Banner Laundry Co. v. Great Eastern Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Manufactured Housing Communities v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Howard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Ag Services of America, Inc. v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  4. Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul v. Halverson (In Re Solberg)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
  5. Creekwood Rental Town-Homes, LLC v. Kiln Underwriting Ltd.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API