Legal Opinion
Blaisdell v. Home Building & Loan Ass'n
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 7, 1933No. 29,615PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLT, Justice.
Appellants presented a petition to the district court for an order extending the period of redemption under the provisions of L. 1933, p. 514, c. 339. The substance of the petition was that appellants wned a certain lot in Minneapolis, which was their homestead and of the reasonable value of $15,000; that appellants on May 1, 1931, executed and delivered their mortgage to respondent on said lot to secure the payment of a certain sum of money, which mortgage contained a valid power of sale by advertisement; that thereafter, by reason of circumstances beyond the control of…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Botkin v. WelshSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Roth v. WaterfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- In Re STEVENSON ASSOCIATES, INC., Debtor. Charles W. STEVENSON, Appellant, v. STEVENSON ASSOCIATES, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.