Legal Opinion
766347 Ontario Ltd. v. Zurich Capital Markets, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 28, 2003No. 02 C 3223PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ST. EVE, District Judge.
Defendants have moved to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. Their motion is granted in part and denied in part. In addition, the Court dismisses Defendants M.J. Diversified Fund, L.P. (“MJD”) and M.J. Financial Arbitrage, L.P. (“MJFA”) sua sponte for failure to state a claim.
BACKGROUND
Asset Allocation Fund, L.P. (“Asset Allocation”) is a limited partnership and commodity pool engaged in the speculative trading of commodity futures contracts and other…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Ellis Henderson v. Michael F. Sheahan and J.W. FairmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Michael Massey and John Otten, M.D. v. David HelmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Mark A. Lee v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Publishers Resource, Inc. v. Walker-Davis Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Natural Gas Commodity LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Zurich Capital Markets Inc. v. CoglianeseDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- Hallas v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2005
- Hershey v. Pacific Investment Management Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- Roldan v. CiceroDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021