Legal Opinion
Zurich Capital Markets Inc. v. Coglianese
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 22, 2005No. 03 C 7960PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ST. EVE., District Judge.
Defendants Oceanic Bank and Trust Limited (“Oceanic”), Kenneth Clowes (“Clowes”), and Terah Rahming (“Rahm-ing”) (collectively “the Oceanic Defendants”) move to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) in its entirety as pled against them. For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants in part and denies in part the Oceanic Defendants’ motion.
BACKGROUND
I. Procedural Background
A. No. Ol-C-6125
On August 14, 2001, ZCM brought suit against Oceanic and several other defendants. ZCM brought claims against Oceanic for securities fraud under…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- John T. Henry and Evelyn I. Henry v. Farmer City State Bank, an Illinois Banking Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Jane Doe v. Allied-Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Publishers Resource, Inc. v. Walker-Davis Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Ellis v. CCA OF TENNESSEE LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Patrick v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Commissioner of Revenue v. Comcast Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. NokesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
- Tillman v. BurgeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.