Legal Opinion

In Re Natural Gas Commodity Litigation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 24, 2004No. 03 Civ.6186 VMPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER AND OPINION

MARRERO, District Judge.

In these consolidated actions, Plaintiffs, traders of natural gas futures contracts on the New York Mercantile Exchange (“NY-MEX”), bring claims under the Commodity Exchange Act against a group of energy companies (“Defendants”) alleging manipulation of the natural gas futures market. Plaintiffs claim that by falsely reporting data on trades of natural gas in the physical market, the defendant companies were able to manipulate the price of natural gas futures contracts for their own benefit and to the detriment of Plaintiffs.

Defendants…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  4. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CurranSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. In Re Polaroid ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  2. Nguyen v. FXCM Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  3. In Re Amaranth Natural Gas Commodities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  4. Dennis v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Richard Hershey v. Energy Transfer PartnersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API