Legal Opinion
Helms v. Alabama Pension Commmission
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 27, 1935No. 3 Div. 139PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
Section 2933, Code, vests in the pension commission full control and supervision of all pensions allowed to Confederate soldiers.
Section 2960, Code, makes it the duty of the probate judges to revise the pension rolls in their counties, and if it shall appear to him that any pensioner is in any way illegally drawing a pension, he must send to the pension commission his name with the recommendation that he bé dropped from the roll. The commission then notifies the probate judge if it appears that any erasures should be made. Likewise, the grand jury may make a similar…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pennie v. ReisSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- United States v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Silberschein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Ex parte DickensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ellis v. State Department of Public Health & WelfareSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- State Ex Rel. McIntyre v. McEachernSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- City of Birmingham v. PenuelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Cox v. DunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Westbrook v. Oklahoma Public Welfare Comm.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.