Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Jackson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 19, 1925No. 8 Div. 676PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The petition is for mandamus directed to the judge of the Eleventh judicial circuit. The controversy was first sought to he presented to this court by appeal from an interlocutory decree allowing alimony and counsel fees pendente lite. Jackson v. Jackson, 211 Ala. 277, 100 So. 332.

The attorneys for the petitioner say:

“The undersigned attorneys most respectfully refer the court, to the briefs on file in this cause when the same was before the court, on appeal as Eighth Division, No. 624, L. L. Jackson, Appellant, v. Kate Eurr Jackson, Appellee. In the petition for mandamus the transcript in.…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pinney v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Andrews v. GreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Brady v. BradySupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
  4. Ex parte Tower Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  5. Murray v. MurraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1887

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SpearsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Board of Education of Jefferson County v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Johnson v. GeraldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Bay Minette Land Co. v. StapletonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Brittain v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API