Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. McIntyre v. McEachern
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 16, 1936No. 4 Div. 861PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
This is a quo warranto proceeding to test the right of appellee to hold the office of “Road and Bridge Foreman” for Houston county. It is claimed that the acts of the Legislature providing for such office are unconstitutional and void, or, if valid, that he was effectually removed from it by proper action of the court of county commissioners. There are three acts which have direct application: Local Act of July 23, 1931 (Acts, p. 266); Local Act of June 27, 1935, p. 71 (H. B. No. 533) ; Local Act of September 13, 1935, p. 251 (H. B. No. 1013).
The act of 1931 purports to repeal…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Silberschein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Eberlein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Eslava v. LepretreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State Tenure Commission v. Madison County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Almon v. Morgan CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Poyner v. WhiddonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Simpson v. Van RyzinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Board of Education of Choctaw County v. KennedySupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.