Legal Opinion
Sarne Handbags Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 5, 2000No. Consol. 97-06-00959-SPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARMAN, Chief Judge.
Defendant, United States, moves for summary judgment pursuant to U.S. CIT R. 56(b), contending it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law because the United States Customs Service (Customs) properly classified the merchandise at issue under subheading 4202.22.15, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 1 , as “Handbags ... With outer surface of sheeting of plastic,” dutiable at a rate of 19.2% ad valorem. Plaintiff, Sarne Handbags Corp. (Sarne), opposes defendant’s motion and cross-moves for summary judgment pursuant to U.S. CIT R. 56(a),…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Worthington v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cargill, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- 3G Mermet Fabric Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Bauer Nike Hockey USA, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Structural Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
- Govesan America Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.