Legal Opinion

Continental Manufacturing Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 23, 1979No. C.D. 4800; Court Nos. 74-2-00331PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

Plaintiffs in these actions joined for trial contest the classification and assessment of duty of six models of trigger sprayers designated as models 922-H, 922-HJ, 922-C, CTS-4700, 5980-05, and 923-H. The sprayers were classified by Customs under item 662.35 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, as modified by Presidential Proclamation 3822, T.D. 68-9, which provides for simple piston pump sprays. Duty was assessed thereon at the rate of 9.5 per centum ad valorem. It is the contention of plaintiffs that the sprayers are not “simple” and are, therefore, properly subject to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Productol Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
  2. United Merchandising Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  3. Brentwood Originals v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Simmon Omega, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  2. National Presto Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API