Legal Opinion
Blakley Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 2, 1998No. Slip Op. 98-94. Court No. 92-10-00670PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARMAN, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to U.S. CIT R. 56. In its Motion for Summary Judgment, plaintiff asserts Customs should have classified and liquidated certain artificial stone floor and wall components imported by plaintiff under subheading 6810.19.50, HTSUS, dutiable at 4.9% ad valorem. Plaintiff requests this Court order Customs to reliquidate the protested entries under subheading 6810.19.50, HTSUS, and refund all excess duties plus interest as provided by law. Defendant counters Customs properly classified the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Lynteq, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- American Bayridge Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Kahrs International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Len-Ron Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Marathon Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- General Electric Company-Medical Systems Group v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.