Legal Opinion

Sneider v. Bank of Italy

California Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1920No. S. F. No. 9429PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.

Plaintiff the administratrix of the estate of George C. Sneider, deceased, is suing to recover the sum of $838.35, claimed to be the balance due on account of moneys deposited with defendant, the Bank of Italy, by said George C. Sneider during his lifetime. The present litigation is the outgrowth of a dispute over the payment of two checks for six hundred dollars each, drawn by George C. Sneider against his account with said defendant bank. These two checks, which were drawn on March 13, 1918, were indorsed by the payee and delivered to the Wells Fargo Nevada National Bank on March 14, 1918,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pullen v. Placer Country BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Hentz v. National City BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  3. Eastman Kodak Co. v. National Park BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1916
  4. Columbia-Knickerbocker Trust Co. v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  5. First National Bank of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania v. National Park BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Guggenhime & Co. v. LamantiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Hiroshima v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Sec.-First Nat'l. Bank of L.A. v. Bank of Am. Nat'l. Tr. & Sav. Ass'n.California Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Caledonia National Bank v. A. J. McPhersonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1950
  5. Spellacy v. DautermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API