Legal Opinion
Hiroshima v. Bank of Italy
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 14, 1926No. Docket No. 3026PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
Plaintiff had judgment in an action against the defendant for negligently paying the amount of a check upon which payment had" been ordered stopped, from which judgment the defendant appeals.
Omitting the formal part, the complaint contains the following allegations:
“That the plaintiff on the 18th day of November, 1924, had on deposit in said bank operated and conducted in said City of Sacramento by the defendant the sum of #823.31, or thereabouts.
“On said 18th day of November, 1924, plaintiff drew a check against said account on deposit in said defendant’s bank in favor of one M. .Yamakita in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Union Constr. Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Pullen v. Placer Country BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Tremont Trust Co. v. BurackMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Bank of Marin v. EnglandSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Kruger v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Cohen v. Kite Hill Community Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Cole v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.