Pullen v. Placer Country Bank
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. F. P. Tuttle, Lee E. Wallace, Charles Tuttle, and Stoney, Rouleau & Stoney, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the Court
This cause was submitted to the superior court upon an agreed statement showing the following facts, — viz.: In November, 1897, John W. Clarke, Sr., had on deposit with the defendant the sum of twelve hundred dollars, which remained on such deposit until after his death. During that month, for the purpose of making a gift of one thousand dollars to his son, John W. Clarke, Jr., he drew a check upon the defendant for that amount of money, and delivered it to his son, saying that he could get the money from the bank; but, after delivering it to him, stated that he wished he would not present it…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Fourth Street Bank of Philadelphia v. YardleySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Bank of the Republic v. MillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- First Nat. Bank of Washington v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Harris v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
- Munn v. BurchIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Lefrooth v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Guggenhime & Co. v. LamantiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Arnold v. San Ramon Valley BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Hiroshima v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.