Legal Opinion

Sec.-First Nat'l. Bank of L.A. v. Bank of Am. Nat'l. Tr. & Sav. Ass'n.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1943No. L. A. No. 18581PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

The plaintiff, Security-First National Bank, issues numerous checks drawn on itself. It was the sole duty of one of plaintiff’s officers, A. M. Hadley, to sign such checks. Each check was presented to him with a debit slip, and if the slip showed that the check was properly authorized and that funds were available in the proper account, he signed the check. Among the employees who prepared debit slips and wrote checks, but who were not authorized to sign checks, was Dee L. Ellis, Jr., head of the accounting division of the trust department. Ellis prepared a number of checks for Hadley’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Los Angeles Investment Co. v. Home Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Jordan Marsh Co. v. National Shawmut BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Seaboard National Bank v. Bank of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. United States Cold Storage Co. v. Central Manufacturing District BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Hatton v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Joffe v. United California BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. California Mill Supply Corp. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Wright v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. United States Rubber Co. v. Union Bank & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Edgington v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API