Brown v. Contech, Division of Sealed Power Technologies
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiff appeals by leave granted a decision entered on December 28, 1992, by the Worker’s Compensation Appellate Commission reversing a decision of a magistrate and denying him benefits. Contech (hereafter defendant) cross appeals. We reverse the decision of the wcac and remand.
Plaintiff began working for defendant in August 1988 as a tool and die maker. Plaintiff repaired damaged dies. His job was considered skilled employment, and required bending, walking, and lifting. On occasion plaintiff lifted parts weighing eighty to one hundred pounds. He used machinery or obtained assistance when…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Paschke v. Retool IndustriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Sobotka v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Sobotka v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Turrentine v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Lee v. Koegel MeatsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Haske v. Transport Leasing, Inc., IndianaMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Russell v. Whirlpool Financial Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Dimcevski v. Utica Packing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- Haske v. Transport Leasing, Inc., IndianaMichigan Supreme Court · 1997