Legal Opinion
Lee v. Koegel Meats
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided May 26, 1993No. Docket 152826PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff seeks leave to appeal an April 30, 1992, opinion and order of the Workers’ Compensation Appellate Commission, one member dissenting, which in relevant respects reversed the decision of a magistrate to award plaintiff benefits for a closed period. In lieu of granting or denying the application, we resolve the issue presented by peremptory opinion. Kerby v Judges’ Retirement Bd, 166 Mich App 302; 420 NW2d 195 (1988).
On June 16, 1989, plaintiff suffered a wrist injury in the course of her employment. On that date, plaintiff was likely one or two weeks pregnant. The commission majority…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Geduldig v. AielloSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Nashville Gas Co. v. SattySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Doe v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Turner v. Department of Employment Security of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wood v. Fletcher Allen Health CareSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Russell v. Whirlpool Financial Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Arnold v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Brown v. Contech, Division of Sealed Power TechnologiesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Sington v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.