Turrentine v. General Motors Corp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Defendant appeals by leave granted from an opinion and order of the Workers’ Compensation Appellate Commission that affirmed a magistrate’s award of disability compensation benefits to plaintiff. We affirm.
Plaintiff was employed by defendant as a spray painter. On January 6, 1987, he suffered an electrical shock in his right hand and chest while spraying with an electrostatic spray gun. He developed myoclonus, an involuntary jerking, which left him unable to hold the spray gun. This claim for disability compensation benefits followed._
The workers’ compensation magistrate awarded plaintiff…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Selk v. Detroit Plastic ProductsMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Hurd v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
- White v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Tarnow v. Railway Express AgencyMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Selk v. Detroit Plastic ProductsMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fraley v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Rea v. Regency Olds/Mazda/VolvoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- Jishi v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- Woody v. Cello-Foil ProductsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- Brown v. Contech, Division of Sealed Power TechnologiesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.