Legal Opinion

Spinelli v. Maxwell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1968No. Appeal, 160PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

This appeal presents a narrow question: does a judgment entered in a trespass action brought in the name of the plaintiff, for both his benefit and that of his subrogated insurance carrier, to recover property damages resulting from an automobile accident, bar a later trespass action between the same parties for personal injuries suffered by the plaintiff in the same accident?

On May 12, 1966, an automobile, owned by Samuel Schlessinger and operated by Earl Maxwell, collided with another automobile, owned and operated by Joseph Spinelli, and, as a result, allegedly,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fisher v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Fields v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Sustrik v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. London v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Saber v. Supplee-Wills-Jones Milk Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Deanna Turner v. Crawford Square Apartments Iii, L.P. McCormack Baron Management Services, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  2. Feinstein v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  3. Marinari v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Robert Wade v. City of Pittsburgh, Victor Muto and William BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. Martin v. PooleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API