Legal Opinion

Sustrik v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1964No. Appeal, 129PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

This is an action of trespass, in the nature of quare clausum fregit wherein the lower court entered a compulsory nonsuit. Plaintiffs appeal.

The plaintiffs are the owners by the entireties of a tract of coal-bearing land in Washington County, Pennsylvania. The defendant-corporation is the owner of adjoining lands upon which is conducted a coal mining operation.

The plaintiffs charge the defendant with and seek recovery of damages, for the unlawful removal of a quantity of coal from underneath the surface of their land; in causing damage to buildings thereon due to a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Simodejka v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Jones v. CostlowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. London v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Baumgartner v. WhinneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Goldstein v. AhrensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Bearoff v. Bearoff Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Dempsey v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Spinelli v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. CASSEL-HESS v. HofferSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Jones v. WagnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API