Marinari v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
The general issue in this asbestos exposure action is whether Pennsylvania, in the context of asbestos actions, shall be a one-disease or two-disease state. More specifically, the issue is whether the two year statute of limitations, 42 Pa.C.S. § 5524(2), bars an action for lung cancer where the action was filed within two years of the cancer diagnosis but four years after asymptomatic pleural thickening had been discovered on x-ray. After lengthy, careful consideration and research, we conclude that Pennsylvania must join a majority of jurisdictions which have adopted a…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Cathcart v. Keene Industrial InsulationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Danziger & De Llano LLP v. Morgan Verkamp LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Summers v. CERTAINTEED CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Pustejovsky v. Rapid-American Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
- Simmons v. Pacor, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.