Legal Opinion

Marinari v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 1992No. 1816PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The general issue in this asbestos exposure action is whether Pennsylvania, in the context of asbestos actions, shall be a one-disease or two-disease state. More specifically, the issue is whether the two year statute of limitations, 42 Pa.C.S. § 5524(2), bars an action for lung cancer where the action was filed within two years of the cancer diagnosis but four years after asymptomatic pleural thickening had been discovered on x-ray. After lengthy, careful consideration and research, we conclude that Pennsylvania must join a majority of jurisdictions which have adopted a…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  4. Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Cathcart v. Keene Industrial InsulationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. Danziger & De Llano LLP v. Morgan Verkamp LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  3. Summers v. CERTAINTEED CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Pustejovsky v. Rapid-American Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Simmons v. Pacor, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API