Legal Opinion

Ottinger v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 6, 1950No. 49102PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDEN, Judge.

The Government has demurred to the plaintiffs’ petition. We must, therefore, determine whether, assuming the truth of the plaintiffs’ allegations, they state a cause of action. We first summarize the allegations.

On September 22, 1943, December 6, 1943, January 3, 1944, and February 29, 1944, the plaintiffs made four separate contracts with the Government which acted through the District Engineer, U. S. Engineer Office, Tulsa, Oklahoma, for the construction of certain levee work. The area in which this work was to be performed had been designated as a critical labor area and all…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Horowitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1865
  3. Deming v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1865
  4. Clemmer Const. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
  5. Froemming Bros., Inc., of Texas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sun Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
  2. Juda v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  3. J. A. Jones Construction Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  4. Cienega Gardens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  5. Peter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API