Legal Opinion

Jones v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 15, 1865PublishedCited by 97 opinions

On the Proofs.

1Opinion of the CourtNott, J.

This is an action brought by two civil engineers to recover $24,026 09 damages growing out of a contract made with them by the Oommis sioner of Indian Affairs for the survey of the districts described in the treaty between the United States and the Choctaw and Chickasaw Indians, (J une 22, ] 855,) and the treaty with the Creeks and Seminóles, (August 7, 1856.) The services required by the contract, it is conceded, were well performed, and the price stipulated has been fully paid. Certain “obstructions and hindrances on the part of the United States in the performance of their contract…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1832
  2. Josselyn v. StoneMississippi Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Winstar Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  5. Yankee Atomic Electric Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API