Legal Opinion
Cienega Gardens v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 27, 1995No. 94-1CPublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBINSON, Judge:
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion for dismissal and plaintiffs cross-motion for partial summary judgment. Plaintiffs’ complaint seeks damages for breach of contract (Count I), just compensation for a taking under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution (Count II), and additional compensation based on allegedly unlawful administrative actions (Count III). Oral argument was held on November 30, 1994.
When the court considers matters presented by the parties outside of the pleadings, as it has in this case with respect to Counts I and II, it…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Alder Terrace, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Cienega Gardens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Cienega Gardens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Anaheim Gardens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Resource Investments, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.