Legal Opinion

Beco Construction Co. v. Bannock Paving Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1990No. 18087PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERNDON, Justice pro tem.

This case arises in quasi contract. Appellant Beco Construction Company, Inc. (Beco) and respondent Bannock Paving Company, Inc. (Bannock Paving), a wholly owned subsidiary of respondent Jack B. Parson Companies, submitted written bids on a subcontract under a Small Business Administration (SBA) set-aside program to benefit contractors having annual average receipts of less than seventeen million dollars ($17,000,000.00) for the preceding three (3) fiscal years. 13 C.F.R. 121.1 (1985). Bannock Paving was awarded the contract as low bidder, but did not qualify as a…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Kalo Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Vanderford Co., Inc. v. KnudsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Sheet Metal Workers Local 441 Health & Welfare Plan v. Glaxosmithkline, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Hayden Lake Fire Protection District v. AlcornIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Meijer, Inc. v. Ferring B.V.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  5. Turcott v. Estate of BatesIdaho Supreme Court · 2019

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API