Legal Opinion

Turcott v. Estate of Bates

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 2019No. Docket No. 45920PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBevan, Justice

I. NATURE OF THE CASE

This appeal concerns a district court's award of damages. Believing that she would be inheriting half of her father Clarence Bates' estate, Deann Turcott and her husband spent considerable time and money making improvements on Clarence's land. However, Clarence subsequently changed his will and left Deann nothing. Deann filed suit seeking quantum meruit damages for the work she had performed. The district court held that quantum meruit damages were not appropriate and awarded damages under a theory of unjust enrichment. Deann appealed the district court's award of unjust…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Lunneborg v. My Fun Life, Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Rutter v. McLaughlinIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Sun Valley Potato Growers, Inc. v. Texas Refinery Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2004
  4. O'Connor v. Harger Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Barry v. Pacific West Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2004

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Siercke v. SierckeIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Frost v. GilbertIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Asher v. McMillanIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Pickering v. SanchezIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Litster Frost v. Idaho Injury Law GroupIdaho Supreme Court · 2022

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API