Legal Opinion
Cooper v. Cranor
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 8, 1950No. 12458_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington denying an application of appellant, Amos Doris Cooper, a prisoner in custody pursuant to a judg ment of a court of the State of Washington, for a writ of habeas corpus. The application alleged that appellant was in custody in violation of the Constitution of the United States. 1 2 Respecting such applications, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 provides:
“An application for a writ of habeas corpus in behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court shall not be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Darr v. BurfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Ex Parte HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- White v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Young v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Morgan v. HorrallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Darcy v. Heinze, Warden, California State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Kunkle v. ClaudyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
- Maurice Duncan v. John R. Cranor, Superintendent of the Washington State Penitentiary at Walla Walla, WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Tom King v. John R. Cranor, Superintendent of the Washington State Penitentiary at Walla Walla, WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950