Legal Opinion
Young v. Ragen
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 6, 1949No. 50PublishedCited by 133 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Vinson
delivered ■ the opinion of thp Court.
We are once again faced with the recurring problem of determining what,- if any, is the appropriate post-trial procedure in .Illinois by which claims of infringement of federal rights may be raised. See Woods v. Nierstheimer, 328 U. S. 211; Marino v. Ragen, 332 U. S. 561; Loftus v. Illinois, 334 U. S. 804. In 1946, petitioner pleaded guilty to an indictment charging' him with having committed burglary and larceny and wap sentenced to five to seven years imprisonment. A year later he filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Circuit Court of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex Parte HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Marino v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Woods v. NierstheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- The People v. LoftusIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
- Loftus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Glover v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Darr v. BurfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Nancy Sullivan v. C. Francis Murphy, Corporation Counsel of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.