White v. Ragen
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
In these cases, petitioners moved in the Supreme Court of Illinois for leave to file their petitions for habeas corpus. Both petitioners are in the custody of respondent, under sentences upon state convictions. In each case, the Illinois court, without requiring an answer from respondent, without appointing an attorney to represent petitioners. and without giving any reasons for its action, denied leave to file the petitions. We granted certiorari, in jorma 'pau-peris, 323 U. S. 704, because the petitions alleged facts showing prima facie violations of petitioners’ rights guaranteed by the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Avery v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Ex Parte HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by335 opinions
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Darr v. BurfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
330 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.