Legal Opinion
Darcy v. Heinze, Warden, California State Prison
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 5, 1952No. 13142PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Chief Judge.
Darcy, serving a life sentence in the California state penitentiary for the crime of kidnapping for the purpose of robbery, appeals from an order of the district court dismissing his application for a writ of habeas corpus. The application alleged, inter alia, that in the trial leading to his conviction he was denied the effective assistance of counsel.
The dismissal was not on the ground that it appeared from the application that Darcy was not entitled thereto. 28 U.S.C. § 2243. The dismissal was based on the failure to exhaust his state remedy as required by 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Darr v. BurfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- White v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Jennings v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Dixon v. DuffySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cooper v. CranorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. SanchezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Commonwealth v. ColemanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- James Reese v. Harley O. Teets, Warden of the California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Kunkle v. ClaudyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
- La Belle v. HancockDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1955