Legal Opinion

Darr v. Burford

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 3, 1950No. 51PublishedCited by 966 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reed

Petitioner Darr, an inmate of the Oklahoma state penitentiary, has been denied federal habeas corpus for failure to exhaust his other available remedies. Petitioner’s omission to apply here for certiorari from the state court’s denial of habeas corpus was held an error, fatal to consideration on the merits. Therefore the merits of petitioner’s claims of imprisonment in violation of the Constitution are not before us. The petition for certiorari requires us to pass solely upon the correctness of the lower court’s view that ordinarily a petition for certiorari must be made to this Court from a…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  3. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Price v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Ex Parte RoyallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by966 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

961 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API