Legal Opinion

Steffenauer v. Mytelka & Rose, Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 3, 1965PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

87 N.J. Super. 506 (1965)

210 A.2d 88

JOHN STEFFENAUER, PLAINTIFF,

v.

MYTELKA & ROSE, INC., D.M. & F.R., INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, AND B-W ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided May 3, 1965.

Mr. Cyril J. McCauley for plaintiff (Mr. Samuel J. Davidson, on the brief).

Mr. Ira A. Levy for defendants (Messrs. Gallanter & Levy, attorneys).

MATTHEWS, J.S.C.

In this action plaintiff seeks a determination that the transaction between the defendants and him, as described hereinafter, is usurious. His complaint demands…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hare v. General Contract Purchase Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  2. Commercial Credit Co. v. TarwaterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Sloan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  4. Equitable Credit & Discount Co. v. GeierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. WeinrichMissouri Court of Appeals · 1924

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Perez v. Rent-A-Center, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  2. Falcone v. Palmer Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  3. McGalliard v. Liberty Leasing Co. of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Petersen v. Philco Finance CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Saul v. Midlantic Nat. Bank/SouthNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API