Legal Opinion

Petersen v. Philco Finance Corporation

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1967No. 9881PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPEAR, Justice.

The principal issue presented by this appeal is whether the Idaho law with respect to usury has application to the finance charge in a conditional sale contract. The appeal is from a determination of the legal rights and obligations of the parties with regard to the sale and purchase of certain coin operated dry cleaning equipment. The cases arose from three separate conditional sale contracts, and were consolidated for trial upon motion by the parties before the district court. One of the contracts, involving only a small amount of money, was eliminated prior to the entry of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sloan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  2. Meridian Bowling Lanes, Inc. v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Wilson v. ConnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. Lloyd v. GutgsellNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Freedman v. HendershottIdaho Supreme Court · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Security Escrow Corp. v. State of Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Bjornstad v. PerryIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Johnson v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  4. Bethke v. Idaho Sav. & Loan AssociationIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  5. C.I.T. Corporation, a New York Corporation v. Lee Pontiac, Inc., Etc., Ralph GorringeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API