Legal Opinion

Hare v. General Contract Purchase Corp.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 7, 1952No. 4-9723PublishedCited by 131 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. P. McFaddiN, Justice.

This, case involves the issue of usury in connection with a sale.

Appellant, Clyde Hare, purchased a used truck from Earl Meeks, a second-hand automobile dealer in Arkadelphia, for $1,750. After making a cash payment of $100, and trading in a car for a credit of $500, the balance due by Hare to Meeks was $1,150. To handle this balance, Piare executed to Meeks a title retaining contract and note for $1,439.13. The note and contract were on forms supplied Meeks by appellée, General Contract Purchase Corporation; and Meeks and Hare understood that the said $1,150 was…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cassen v. CassenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  2. Strickler v. State Auto Finance Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  3. German Bank v. DeShonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
  4. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. ManionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  5. Ford v. HancockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by131 opinions

  1. Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Smith v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Parish v. PittsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. Carper v. Kanawha Banking & Trust Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Bradley v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API